Figure 1. This is just five of the twenty randomly used for observation and statistical analysis of the CFU. The rate of this group is fair. |
Figure 3. I would say the rate for this group would be fair. |
Figure 4. |
Figure 5. I would rate this group as very poor. There is a rigid circular shaped colony in the bottom row of the left plate. |
Figure 6. I would rate this group as poor. |
The plants that I seeded with
Sonora wheat and Anasazi beans died because there was no watering due to my
absence of the lab. Although I infected three Anasazi beans with the possibly
A. tumefaciens, I wasn’t able to get any results because of my poor responsibilities
in the lab. On the other hand, my first project with the fomites is going
somewhat okay. I have sampled more than 8 locations around campus, and each
location had about 20 plates used for each site. If my calculations are
correct, I used about hundred and eighty plates, and trashed about a sleeve of
incorrect plates when pouring. The figures above show some of the randomly
obtained samples from each site that was going to be analyzed using Photoshop
software. Furthermore, I would rate the group as poor, fair, or acceptable for either necessary action or non-necessary action to be handled in the caption.
No comments:
Post a Comment